Skip to content

Northern Chambers of Commerce call for rejection of proposed riding changes

Businesses in Northern Ontario's largest centres have raised concerns over proposed changes to federal electoral boundaries in the region in an open letter.
Electoral District CROP
A proposed boundary change would merge sections of the Kenora riding into Thunder Bay-Rainy River by April 2024.

Businesses from Northern Ontario's largest cities have added their voice to a chorus of opposition to proposed changes to federal electoral boundaries that would reduce the region's representation in Ottawa.

The Northern Chambers of Commerce, which speaks on behalf of local chambers in Thunder Bay, Sudbury, Sault Ste. Marie, Timmins, and North Bay, conveyed its concerns in an open letter released Wednesday.

Adjustments proposed by the Federal Electoral Boundaries Commission for Ontario would reduce the number of ridings in Northern Ontario from 10 to nine, merging the Kenora and Red Lake areas into Thunder Bay-Rainy River, with other parts of the Kenora riding joining a new, sparsely populated Kiiwetinoong-Mushkegowuk riding taking in remote Indigenous communities between Manitoba and Quebec.

The letter argues that simply applying a population-based formula to redistribute ridings in the region will create the unintended consequence of removing a voice from an "already underrepresented" region of the country.

“Our ability to advocate through our members of parliament would be reduced, which would pose a challenge to business organizations and their ability to serve their members' needs.”

“The new proposed boundary lines would further exacerbate challenges in an already expansive territory, not to mention the challenge that would pose for any one representative to cover the issues of that entire geographical area,” it continues.

The letter is addressed to Stéphane Perrault, Canada's Chief Electoral Officer, and copied to Northern Ontario MPs.

MPs in the region have signed a joint letter expressing similar concerns, saying the changes could weaken representation for residents.

The letter also argued removing a representative and expanding current riding boundaries could impede political participation by Indigenous peoples living in these remote and rural regions.

“The Northern Chambers... find this constitutionally-triggered process to be archaic and unintentionally discriminatory by not accounting for underrepresented and under-serviced groups in the region deserving of equity," it reads.

The Northern Ontario Chambers of Commerce said that's a particular concern for its members given their strong commitment to principles of economic reconciliation.

“The Indigenous are Canada's fastest growing population, not only leading strong, legacy enterprises in their own right but lending to new and innovative practices that support and bolster business and their workforce,” the letter read.

An important step toward principles of Truth and Reconciliation would be "maintaining the current number of ridings in Northern Ontario.”

***An earlier version of this story referred to Elections Canada as having a role in this process. However, Elections Canada has no say in how the riding boundaries are drawn, said a spokesperson for Elections Canada. Final decisions as to where the federal boundaries will lie are made exclusively by the independent commissions set up in each province, the spokesperson goes on to say. For Ontario, therefore, those decisions lie with the Ontario commission. It is also the commissions' role, and not Elections Canada's to consider the input received from Canadians and members of the House of Commons when determining the boundaries. .