Ireland, well known as the "Celtic Tiger,"
has become an industrial showcase for economists around the
world. In the early 1970s, one of the most backward regions of
Europe began a series of policy initiatives that transformed
the country into a knowledge-based economy with a standard
of
living higher than the United Kingdom and
Canada.
One Irish initiative that could apply to
Ontario was an energy policy committed to using indigenous fuel
to help offset expensive imports of oil. That local energy
source was peat fuel, and surprisingly the largest accessible
deposits in the world are in Ontario.
Peat fuel has been a source of heat in
Ireland for centuries. Its use for electricity started in the
1950s and supplied just under 40 percent of total power
generation by the mid-1960s. Currently, peat fuel supplies
about 12 percent of the country's power needs. Last year, two
new peat-fired power plants were opened at a cost of $570
million (US).
Brownish-black in color, peat is a material
formed from the partial decomposition of plants under very wet,
acidic conditions. It is usually made up of two separate
layers, the top being lighter in colour, less decomposed and is
used primarily for horticultural applications while the dark,
dense lower layers are excellent for fuel. Peatlands are mostly
found in temperate areas like Canada, Russia, and Northern
Europe and in some tropical countries like Indonesia.
Evil supernatural places
Peatlands can be described as a wet spongy
"floating carpet" of land and are often known as bogs, fens,
mires, moors or in Canada muskeg.
Historically these areas have been seen as
strange or evil supernatural places. Ancient "bog bodies" have
been found in many northern European peatlands, perfectly
preserved due to the acidic and anaerobic conditions. Dating
back thousands of years, they were probably sacrificed to
celebrate military victories or punished for ancient
crimes.
Peat energy equals72 billion barrels of
oil
By far, Canada has the biggest deposits in
the world, its peatlands covering approximately 170 million
hectares. According to a provincial government report, Northern
Ontario's vast bogs have the energy equivalent of 72 billion
barrels of oil - this province's own version of the Alberta tar
sands, none of which is being harvested for energy use.
The Hudson Bay lowlands, encompassing about
one quarter of the province's geography - north of the
Precambrian Shield and hugging the southern shores of James and
Hudson Bay - is one of the largest continuous expanses of peat
bog outside of Siberia.
Finland and Ireland, two of the largest users
of peat fuel for electricity, only contain respectively, about
10 million and 1.2 million hectares of peatlands.
There is strong opposition in Ireland, the
United Kingdom and other European countries to the development
of peatlands. However, many of these countries are densely
populated, small in size and have been harvesting peat-fuel for
centuries. Ireland can comfortably fit into Northern Ontario
nine times over. Irish-based Bord na Mona, the sole producer
and supplier of peat for energy purposes, owns about seven per
cent of that country's peatlands, which amount to just 80,000
hectares.
Fears about high power costs and security of
supply during the oil price hikes of the early 1970s encouraged
Finland to develop its own abundant peat fuel deposits.
Today, problems in oil and gas producing
countries and the voracious energy appetites of China and India
ensure that energy prices remain high and in short supply. We
are consuming two barrels of oil for every one we find.
Closer to home, Ontario must replace its
nuclear fleet, the source of almost half the province's
electricity within a decade and a half. Furthermore, the ruling
Liberals are still committed to unplugging another 17 percent
of the province's power production in 2009 by closing the four
coal-fired generating plants due to pollution concerns.
Cleaner than coal,cheaper than oil
Peat fuel is much cleaner than coal and
cheaper than oil and gas. With inexpensive modifications peat
fuel can be used by itself or in combination with coal in the
existing coal-fired power plants already paid for by the
taxpayers.
Peat fuel has only 10 percent of the sulphur
content of coal, virtually no mercury and produces less ash
waste and dust emissions. Ontario Hydro Research concluded that
"an upgraded fuel peat can be effectively co-fired with propane
or coal without any serious adverse affects." It's done in
Europe to lower coal pollution.
Ontario-based Peat Resources Limited's
project, centered near the Town of Upsala, approximately 100
kilometers from the two Northern Ontario coal-fired plants at
Atikokan and Thunder Bay, is focused on extensive environmental
surveys, bulk sample testing and engineering studies. Now, in
the second phase of its program, Peat Resources confirms enough
peat fuel to sustain production of about one million tonnes per
year for more than 20 years. To put this into perspective,
every year in Canada, nature adds more than 100 million tonnes
to the peat resource base.
In Europe, traditional dry harvesting methods
involve stripping and draining large areas and using the sun to
dry the peat. European peat-fired power plants use a lower
grade peat then the upgraded variety necessary for Ontario's
coal-fired generators. Due to northwestern Ontario's cooler
climate and costs, Peat Resources intends to use wet harvesting
methods to lessen environmental impacts.
Wet harvesting lessenvironmental impact
Wet harvesting, when carried out on smaller
parcels of land, allows easier management of water inflow and
outflow and minimizes any negative effects on nearby lakes and
drainage systems. The peat will then be mechanically dewatered
before thermal upgrading for Ontario coal-fired power
plants.
Wet harvesting from smaller parcels of land
also allows quicker start-up of land reclamation activities
when the harvest of peat is completed. No resource development
is allowed in Ontario without restoration or closure plans.
Peat Resource's plans will include the stocking of sports fish,
the planting of wild rice and specific contouring of the
landscape to establish productive wetlands that support
thriving wildfowl populations.
Environmental comparisons to the Alberta Tar
Sands will be inevitable. However, peat fuel deposits are
shallow, seldom deeper than 20 feet, compared to oily bitumen
in northern Alberta which can entail monstrously huge open pits
that can be up to 300 feet deep.
Ontario is currently studying possible green
alternatives for the Atikokan coal plant. The potential
biofuels include wood waste and peat fuel, however no decision
will be made until late 2006.
Burning peat fuel does release carbon dioxide
but this is balanced by the elimination of methane gas
generation from the peat bogs. This greenhouse gas is 23 times
more detrimental to the environment than CO2. In Europe, former
peatlands have become carbon sinks through reforestation,
agricultural use or restoration to former wetland uses.
Ontario desperate for
power
In a recent report, the province's own
Independent Electricity System Operator (IESO) stressed the
need to keep the two southern Ontario coal-fired generating
stations at Lambton and Nanticoke open or else potentially face
power blackouts.
By replacing or mixing peat fuel with coal in
our existing coal-fired power plants, pollution emissions will
be significantly lowered, tax-funded infrastructure doesn't
need to be wasted, jobs are created in the north and the
province has secure and inexpensive electricity.
There is no doubt that one of the most
critical global issues of the 21st century will be the
availability of secure and economic sources of energy.
What will economically replace coal in
Ontario's energy mix and still sustain the province's
manufacturing might?
Why is the Ontario government ignoring the
largest accessible peat fuel deposits in the world?
Stan Sudol is a Toronto-based communications consultant
who writes extensively on mining and provincial issues.