Skip to content

Takeovers of Inco, Falco top story of 2006

You would have to be living on some unconnected deserted island in the South Pacific - not including New Caledonia - not to know that the "story of the year" was the foreign takeovers of Inco and Falconbridge.
Xstrata_winter_290

You would have to be living on some unconnected deserted island in the South Pacific - not including New Caledonia - not to know that the "story of the year" was the foreign takeovers of Inco and Falconbridge.


That is not the way anyone in this city envisioned the final outcome in January when the spot price of nickel was trading at about ($US) 13,500 a tonne versus last week's price of just a little over 35,500.


By the end of January, there were concerns the "metallic marriage made in heaven" was starting to go wrong when Inco had to extend its offer for Falconbridge to June 30 due to delayed government approvals from the United States and the European Union.


The regulatory holdups were destined to become one of the major causes of the merger's failure.


On May 8, Vancouver-based Teck-Cominco made a hostile bid for Inco on condition that the Falconbridge merger was dropped. On May 16, Xstrata made a hostile cash bid for the 80 percent of Falconbridge that it did not already own.


On June 26, Arizona-based Phelps Dodge, in a friendly deal, agreed to buy both Inco and Falconbridge, allowing the original merger to go ahead in a (US) $40 billion deal, the largest in Canadian corporate history. Intense opposition to this deal surfaced from Phelps Dodge shareholders.


In the interim, Xstrata, Phelps Dodge, Teck-Cominco, and Inco all increased their various bids, but the final knockout punch came from Xstrata on July 19 with a cash (Cdn) $16.3 billion offer. Inco admitted defeat and abandoned merger efforts with Falconbridge.


On Aug. 11, CVRD, the world's biggest producer of iron ore,  unveiled a (Cdn) $17 billion cash offer for Inco trumping competing cash/share offers from Phelps Dodge and Teck-Cominco.


By Sept. 24, Inco told its shareholders to tender to CVRD's offer and the end of an era in Canadian mining comes to a close as the two iconic nickel miners fell under foreign control.


Obviously, in hindsight, mistakes were made by Inco and Falconbridge.


However, the biggest culprit has to be the federal Martin Liberals and Harper Tories. No other major industrial power in the world would have allowed a trillion-dollar natural resource like the Sudbury Basin to fall under foreign control.


The most capitalistic country in the world, the United States, blocked a proposed Chinese takeover of a small oil producer, Unocal Corporation, due to national security reasons.


Both the Liberal and Tory disinterest in this issue and their abysmal lack of support for Inco - by pressuring the European Union to speed up regulatory approvals - were nothing short of scandalous.


But this is all water under the bridge. The deal is done.


Sudbury will benefit from the financial clout of the larger CVRD Inco and Xstrata Nickel with the rapid development of new mines in the Basin.


To date, both CVRD and Xstrata have shown great respect for their skilled workers, and both appear committed to honouring past agreements and intend to use local suppliers. On December 18, Xstrata Nickel announced a $5 million investment in the Centre for Excellence in Mining Innovation (CEMI) at Laurentian University. There is no doubt both these companies will be good corporate citizen.


But for the generations of workers, whose roots run deep in the Sudbury Basin, the heart and soul of the global nickel industry, it is the end of an era. For them, it will take a little time to adjust.


Stan Sudol is a Toronto-based communications consultant and policy analyst who writes extensively on mining issues. [mailto:[email protected]]


Comments

Verified reader

If you would like to apply to become a verified commenter, please fill out this form.