Skip to content

Super-mills make us hostages

For the past 17 years, I have been a wilderness advocate.

For the past 17 years, I have been a wilderness advocate. I have worked with environmental groups, logging companies, and the Ministry of Natural Resources to try to ensure balance between resource extraction, wild life habitat, and social needs for wild spaces.

I was very discouraged to hear David Ramsay, my MPP, and the Minister of Natural Resources say earlier this week that the small sawmills in Ontario are a thing of the past. This is wrong. It is wrong for the forests. It is wrong for the communities dependant on those forests. It is wrong for the long-term sustainability of both.

Ramsay spoke about the need to compete globally, and how this can only be done by building super-mills running two or three shifts that produce their products cheaply. Does this support communities? No. Does this enhance our quality of life? No. What sort of family life is there for these workers who are forced to do the midnight shift?

Do super-mills support sustainable development? No. Sustainable jobs? No. One big mill employs fewer people than the three mills it replaces.

Already our forests are stressed to provide enough trees for industrial demand. Will super-mills reduce this stress? No. In fact, the super-mills in
northwestern Ontario are demanding a decrease in wildlife habitat reserves.

Ramsay said we have to support the super-mills or the big companies will walk away from Northern Ontario. I say good riddance. How do we benefit in any way from the threats and bribes from these companies? They cut more wood with fewer workers, and end up holding all the cards when it comes to making tough decisions about our forests and communities. And when the shareholder profits are shaky, the mill moves away (note Weyerhaeuser in Sturgeon Falls).

Super-mills only serve to make us hostage to the demands of the owners.

On the other side, the many smaller, family run mills that still exist in the northeast employ more workers in a more sustainable way.

If one mill shuts - the whole area does not decline. The workers more often than not are able to find work at the remaining smaller mills, because the dedicated wood supply remains local.

If Ramsay says no to the super-mills, and they do leave the north, this will surely bring new investment in all the smaller mills. Just as nature abhors a vacuum, so does industry. Twenty small businesses have a much greater chance of creating stable employment than one big one.

Ramsay also spoke of developing many secondary' industries in the smaller communities. Value-added mills, such as finger-jointing mills, can indeed create much needed jobs in our small communities. These are long overdue, and very welcome to our northern communities. But they are totally unrelated to wether we have super-mills or not.

Who is most important in the decision-making processes in Northern Ontario? The multi-national companies? The Minister of Natural Resources? Or the people who live here?

Let's take back the control of our communities and our forests. Write a letter to Ramsay, and send a copy to the editor. If you work in the forest industry, you would do well to start taking a political interest in your future. Phone the minister. Or better yet, write a letter, and get everyone you know to do so as well. When enough people take notice, so do the politicians - let your voice be heard.

Tell Ramsay to say no to shutting down smaller mills and moving wood supply out of communities; to stop bowing to the bribes (we'll make jobs) and threats (or we'll leave). The big companies do not serve the best interest of long-term sustainability of communities on the north. Phone Ramsay at
1-888-701-1105, or sent him a fax to (705) 647-1976.




Comments

Verified reader

If you would like to apply to become a verified commenter, please fill out this form.